Did you really have to ask that question?
"What a waste there's much better games out there..."
I imagine you and the other person cross your arms and poke your bottom lip out after each sentence you type, lol.
So Fable 3 is out now on PC? I didn't know it came out yet on PC.
Until I can get Gears somewhere else, no, I won't be giving up my 360, lol.
It seems to me MS is being kind of cautious in their spending on a new ip. The only games I notice that sell well on the 360, other than shooters, are Fallout and Fable. But then again, Fallout is a shooter...Maybe I should replace Fallout with Oblivion. Anyway, the next exclusive they bring out, they'll have to do a better job than they did with Alan Wake.
One bubble explains it all, lol.
Yeah, its crazy, I mean even my local Wal-mart sells them, lol. Come on, Walmart? Yeah, seriously...
Maybe...but I can not tell what MS is going to do with Kinect honestly. If they make it an open platform like the iPhone or whatever, then its probably going to be prone to shovelware. But if they close it off similar to how Live is facilitated, then there is less chance of shovelware.
At least they get to concentrate on one platform. It ought to be rather impressive.
Crysis...but then again...Metro 2033 might've taken the crown. This is all on PC of course. On consoles the crown still belongs to UC2...until the new games start coming out and are being played in homes.
"PS3 games might not be nearly as open world as crysis but it CAN do those graphics."
No it can not. Don't troll my comment please. And stop hyping what the PS3 can do. I've played all of the PS3 games and Crysis and there isn't anyway your comment would be validated as true. Its not even close.
And you used a bullshot from KZ and concept art from Crysis.
KZ didn't look like that on my Sony Bravia, not even clo...
You're comparing those two games visuals? I can tell you've never seen Crysis, lol.
Ahh, a 360 exclusive. You know, I equate that to being the Milkshake that brings the trolls to the yard =P
I just love how some of you are telling this person to get a life away from games. Yet this is a website for video games. Yeah.... =/
You can just ignore the serivice you know? Anyway, I'm impressed with this person's blog. I didn't even know it came out yet, outside of the US. I have nothing against Onlive, I feel its just another option for gaming.
You get to see UC3, thats one good reason right there. I get to see more of Gears 3 so thats two good reasons for me.
"It should be the other way around, "Can PSP phone compete with WP7" because WP7 is the established phone and hardly anything is known about the PSP Phone.
As for the answer, were going to have to wait and see if the PSP Phone can bring it, I'm not holding my breath though."
FINALLY, the first comment of an article is intelligent and obviously the truth. I thank you...
"I'd Buy a Halo: Combat Evolved Remake, Wouldn't You?"
I would because it would help me get into the series better or at least appreciate it more, seeing as though I've never played the whole game.
The guy is stating an analytical opinion. Besides, what you quote him as saying, doesn't have anything to do with this statement the article is talking about.
"Is Half-Life 2 Still King of the Shooters?"
I don't see how it could be. The shooting mechanics are basic while most of the weapons are too.
Edit: The title should be called "Is Half-life 2 still king of video games?", instead of "Is Half-Life 2 Still King of the Shooters?" because it limits the greatness of the game when more than likely the shooting aspect is its weakest point. My opinion though. Even then I personally...
"So this is Pachter talk?"
If it was in favor of anything but the 360, would you care?